Which Physical Metrics Drive Contract Value? What GMs Look for in Free Agents
scoutinganalyticscontracts

Which Physical Metrics Drive Contract Value? What GMs Look for in Free Agents

UUnknown
2026-02-10
8 min read
Advertisement

Hook: Why your exit velocity, sprint speed and arm strength might be worth more than your batting average

Free agents and fringe big-leaguers: if you want to increase your market value, practicing harder isn’t enough. General Managers (GMs) are buying measurable physical traits that translate into runs saved and runs created. That means exit velocity, sprint speed and arm strength are frequently the levers that move contract dollars — especially in the data-first market of 2026.

The inverted pyramid: the top-line truth GMs act on now

Over the last three winters (2023–2026) teams accelerated their reliance on Statcast/TrackMan data and biomechanical profiles. The result: GMs pay premiums for players who 1) show elite physical metrics, 2) demonstrate consistent translation to outcomes (barrel rate, sprint-generated bases, outfield arm runs), and 3) have a clean medical/aging profile. If you want a higher AAV, prioritize metrics that front offices directly connect to wins and predictability.

Quick summary — what to prioritize (by position)

  • Corner hitters / power bats: max exit velocity, average EV, barrel rate.
  • Middle infield / center fielders: sprint speed, first-10 ft split, defensive range metrics.
  • Catchers: pop time and arm velocity, plus durability metrics.
  • Outfield arms: arm velocity and carry (accuracy), which convert to outfield arm runs.
  • Pitchers: pitch velocity profile and spin/biomechanics that predict injury risk and sustainability.

Case study: Kyle Tucker (2026) — why the Dodgers paid up

The January 2026 blockbuster showing the Dodgers agreeing to a four-year, $240 million deal for Kyle Tucker sent a clear message across the industry. Executives justified the spend not simply by counting home runs, but by pointing to a predictable package of elite physical and Statcast outputs: consistent max exit velocities, a high barrel and hard-hit rate, plus defensive range. In short: Tucker’s physical testing projected sustained above-average run creation and limited downside.

That mirrors a wider trend in the 2025–26 offseason: teams were less interested in one-year spikes and more interested in persistent physical baselines and positive trends. GMs rewarded players who turned high-level metrics into repeatable performance.

What the data-driven front office actually looks for

Here’s what scouts, analytics directors and GMs evaluate — in order of impact:

  1. Translation to outcomes: Does high exit velocity convert to barrels and extra-base hits? Does sprint speed create steals and defensive range? Teams prefer metrics that tie directly to run impact.
  2. Percentile rank and thresholds: Front offices care about where a player sits within MLB percentiles. Being top-10% in a critical metric is far more valuable than being average in several.
  3. Consistency & trend: A rising trajectory in metric performance over 1–3 seasons reduces perceived risk and increases projection value.
  4. Age & injury profile: Younger players with elite metrics get longer-term investments. Older players with compensating elite metrics can still command high AAVs for shorter terms.
  5. Biomechanics & medical signals: In 2026 many clubs integrate biomechanical screens and wearables into their medical evaluation — not to punish players, but to identify sustainable performers.

It’s one thing to say metrics matter; it’s another to act on them. Below are the typical mappings GMs use to convert physical measurements into dollars.

Exit velocity → power premium

Why it matters: Max exit velocity and average EV are the strongest single-game predictors of extra-base hits and slugging. Teams value hitters who consistently generate hard contact because it’s repeatable and less volatile than BA-based metrics.

Practical contract link: Players in the MLB top quartile for max EV and barrel rate often secure multi-year deals with higher AAVs because teams believe they will continue to produce isolated power and walk rates that drive OPS/SLG.

Sprint speed → defense and baserunning value

Why it matters: Sprint speed is a direct input to Statcast defensive metrics (OAA, Outs Above Average) and to stolen-base success. For elite defenders and table-setting hitters, sprint speed converts to runs via both defense and extra bases.

Practical contract link: Middle infielders and CFs with sprint speed in the elite percentiles (and demonstrable defensive metrics) command greater term and money — especially for clubs buying defense and range.

Arm strength → run prevention and positional premium

Why it matters: Arm velocity and carry map directly to outfield arm runs and catcher pop time metrics. Outfielders with plus arms save runs and reduce opponent aggression; catchers who can control running games lower stolen-base runs against.

Practical contract link: A demonstrably above-average arm can push a solid hitter up the market ladder by turning a neutral defensive player into an elite run-preventer.

Benchmarks to target in 2026 (approximate, position-aware)

Use these as working targets. Percentiles shift year-to-year, but these thresholds mirror what clubs labeled as “premium” in 2024–2026 analytics/draft cycles.

  • Max exit velocity: Aim for 100+ mph to enter the elite conversation. 95–99 mph is very strong for most positions.
  • Average exit velocity: 90+ mph is a solid upper-tier mark. Consistency matters: a high average EV across a full season beats a single-sample spike.
  • Barrel rate: Top quartile barrel rate (contextual by PA) is what GMs pay for in power hitters.
  • Sprint speed: 29+ ft/s is elite in 2026; 28–29 ft/s is very good for middle-infielders and CF candidates.
  • Arm velocity (OF): 90+ mph from the outfield puts you in a premium defensive tier.
  • Catch pop time: <1.90s is desirable; <1.85s is elite and can offset offensive deficiencies.

Video breakdowns: what to record and how to present to GMs

In 2026, high-quality video combined with synced metrics is table stakes for remote evaluations. Here’s an efficient workflow that scouts and GMs respect.

1. Equipment & capture

2. Clip selection

  • 10–20 swings/throws: include both max-effort and game-effort reps to demonstrate range.
  • Highlight one consistent max-effort swing/throw with metric overlays (max EV, bat speed, bat path).
  • Include sprint track clips (first-10 ft split and full 90 ft) with corresponding sprint speed numbers.

3. Annotation & narrative

GMs want concise narratives: what the metric shows and why it projects. Use overlays: max EV, avg EV, barrel, sprint speed, arm velocity, pop time. Then label how that translates to run creation/saving — e.g., “95–102 mph max EV → high XBH probability; elite for LH/RH splits.” For packaging and distribution advice, see a practical guide on turning mentions into earned distribution like a digital PR workflow.

4. Progress timeline

Include a 6–12 month timeline showing measurable improvement. A rising trend reduces perceived risk and increases contract value. Track and store progress in formats your analytics team can ingest (the same sorts of practices recommended when hiring data engineers to manage high-volume sports datasets).

Training to move the needle — targeted programs that actually increase valuation

Training must be metric-focused and documented. Below are practical drills and progressions tied to contract-relevant improvements.

Exit velocity program (8–12 weeks)

  1. Biomechanical assessment: baseline swing video, hip-shoulder separation, bat path, hand speed.
  2. Velocity-specific drills: heavy/overload bat swings (3–5 weeks, supervised), band-resisted rotational medicine ball throws for hip speed, and intent-based tee/track sessions focusing on hard-contact targets.
  3. Strength & speed: Olympic-lift derivatives for hip explosiveness, sled pushes for lower-body drive, and short linear power work.
  4. Monitor: weekly launch monitor sessions tracking max EV and average EV, with videos showing the same swing intent and contact point.

Sprint speed program (6–10 weeks)

  1. Acceleration mechanics: A/B/C drills, fall starts, and overspeed strides for turnover and posture.
  2. Strength: hip hinge strength, single-leg power (bulgarian split squats), and glute-ham raises.
  3. Resisted & assisted work: sled pushes/pulls for force development; careful overspeed towing for turnover (done sparingly and under supervision).
  4. Testing: measured 10-yard split and full 90-ft sprints on turf with radar or GPS for sprint speed tracking. For compact training options and travel-friendly strength gear, see guides on how to stay fit on the road.

Arm strength & pop time protocol (8–12 weeks, medically supervised)

  1. Progressive long toss: structured distances with recovery days — focus on carry and accuracy.
  2. Weighted-ball integration: only under a credentialed program to reduce injury risk; strength-phase before arm-speed phase.
  3. Shoulder & scapular health: rotator cuff, scapular stabilizers, and thoracic mobility — daily maintenance work.
  4. Testing: radar-measured arm velocity and catcher pop-time drills; track progress in a simple spreadsheet GMs can read. See practical tool and field-kit reviews for what to bring to sessions (field toolkit reviews).

Risk management: what turns teams off and how to avoid it

Physical metrics attract interest — medical red flags and volatility kill deals. GMs will discount players who show:

  • Big spikes in metrics with no repeatability or poor biomechanics.
  • Medical history that suggests declining ceilings (repeated arm injuries, chronic lower-body issues).
  • Inconsistent data sampling — e.g., one launch monitor session vs. a season of tracked numbers.

Fixes: document a consistent testing cadence, show supervised rehab or strength programs that address medical concerns, and provide biomechanical analyses showing sustainable mechanics. For guidance on preparing quality datasets and governance, consult resources on ethical data pipelines.

Two major shifts are shaping contracts in 2026 and beyond:

  • AI-driven projection models: Teams now fuse biomechanics, Statcast, and medical wearables into predictive models. Players who can produce clean, machine-readable datasets (consistent launch monitor logs, high-frame video, wearable histories) will get better valuations.
  • Hybrid athlete premiums: The most valuable free agents in 2025–26 were those who combined power with elite defensive metrics — the
Advertisement

Related Topics

#scouting#analytics#contracts
U

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-02-18T08:36:44.999Z